Current Benchmark Verified

95% Fewer Tokens,
All the Context

Current benchmark: 1,360 decisions in 311,752 tokens for CLAUDE.md vs 15,476 tokens for Continuity. 95% token savings and 20.1× efficiency. CLAUDE.md hits the 200K context limit around 864 decisions while Continuity keeps working.

Calculate Your SavingsSee How We Tested

✓ Mathematical proof included • ✓ CLAUDE.md breaks around 864 decisions • ✓ O(1) vs O(n) complexity advantage

95%
Token Savings
311,752 → 15,476 tokens
20.1×
Efficiency Multiplier
O(1) vs O(n) complexity
1,360
Decisions Encoded
229.2 tokens per decision
$533+
Monthly Savings
At 600 sessions/month

Calculate Your Savings

Based on the current benchmark snapshot: 1,360 decisions and 600 sessions/month

Calculate Your Savings

100
10 requests500 requests
Monthly Savings
$88.88
vs current benchmark baseline
Annual Savings
$1066.59
First year total
Net Monthly
$+79.88
After $9 subscription
Return on Investment
+888%
✅ Profitable from day one
Token Savings
95%
Verified against the current benchmark snapshot
Benchmark cost without Continuity:$93.53/month
Benchmark cost with Continuity:$13.64/month
Your Total Savings:$88.88/month
Verified against current benchmark data (1,360 decisions)
See full methodology →•Run test yourself

Savings at Different Usage Levels

Typical developer usage: 50-600 requests per month

Sessions/MonthMonthly SavingsAnnual SavingsROI vs $9 Plan
50$44.44$533.30+394%
100$88.88$1066.59+888%
200$177.77$2133.19+1875%
600$533.30$6399.56+5826%

Savings start immediately - at 600 sessions/month, the benchmark saves $533.30/month before the $9 plan cost is subtracted.

Mathematical Proof of Efficiency

Current benchmark analysis of CLAUDE.md scaling limits vs Continuity's O(1) search-based retrieval

Real CLAUDE.md Analysis

Actual production CLAUDE.md file with 1,360 logged decisions. Base instructions: 5,201 tokens. Average per decision: 225.4 tokens.

System breaks at about 864 decisions when CLAUDE.md exceeds the 200K token context limit. At 1,360 decisions it needs 311,752 tokens.

O(n) Scaling Problem

CLAUDE.md grows linearly: 311,752 tokens at 1,360 decisions. Every session loads all decisions regardless of relevance.

Cost per session: $0.935. Unusable beyond about 864 decisions.

O(1) Search Retrieval

Continuity loads only relevant decisions via semantic search. Total: 15,476 tokens at the current benchmark.

Cost per session: $0.046. Scales with retrieval budget.

Mathematical Proof

Complexity analysis: O(1) vs O(n). Continuity maintains constant retrieval costs while CLAUDE.md grows linearly past the context window.

20.1× efficiency multiplier. Search-based retrieval remains the durable option as projects grow.

O(1) vs O(n): The Fundamental Difference

O(n)
CLAUDE.md Approach
Loads all 1,360 decisions every session
311,752 tokens • Breaks around 864 decisions
O(1)
Continuity Search
Loads only relevant decisions
15,476 tokens • Scales with retrieval budget

The more decisions you log, the worse CLAUDE.md performs. Continuity maintains constant efficiency.

Real-World Comparison at Scale

Production CLAUDE.md with 1,360 decisions vs Continuity's search-based retrieval

CLAUDE.md (O(n) Growth)

Tokens:311,752
Decisions:1,360 (all loaded)
Cost per Session:$0.935
Breaking Point:~864 decisions

Continuity (O(1) Search)

Tokens:15,476
Decisions:1,360 (3 queries × 15 results)
Cost per Session:$0.046
Breaking Point:None (scales with retrieval budget)

Savings Per Session

296,276
Tokens Saved
95% reduction
20.1×
Efficiency Multiplier
O(1) vs O(n) advantage
$0.89
Saved Per Session
At the current benchmark

See the Full Analysis

Complete mathematical proof, current benchmark analysis, and scaling comparison available on GitHub.

View Mathematical ProofGet Started with Continuity